There is no single "best" Link-Belt excavator. If someone tells you there's a one-size-fits-all answer, they're probably trying to sell you something. The machine that makes sense for a water-line contractor isn't necessarily the right fit for a rental yard, and both of those are different from what a highway crew needs. I learned that lesson more than once.
I've been the guy handling equipment orders for a mid-size excavation company for the past eight years. That doesn't make me the smartest person in the room—I'm the guy who keeps the spreadsheet of our mistakes, which is a more honest title. So let's walk through the choices based on your situation, and I'll show you why the sticker price shouldn't be the first number you look at.
Before we get into scenarios, let's talk about Link-Belt excavator sizes. The lineup covers everything from compact models in the 4- to 6-ton range to large production machines around 80 tons. In the middle, you'll find the Link-Belt 135 excavator—a 13-ton class machine that seems to be the one people ask about first. There are also common classes like the 75, 175, 210, 245, and larger. Each one has a different transport weight, reach, and attachment capacity, so "135" is not a one-number answer to anything. You need to check the spec sheet, not just the model number.
TCO means total cost of ownership. Not just the monthly payment, but delivery, setup, insurance, maintenance, fuel, downtime, and resale. On a 135, the base price is one line. The lowboy to get it to the job site, the thumb kit, the oil analysis, and the days it's down waiting for parts are all lines too. The cheapest quote can be the most expensive machine if the dealer support isn't there.
If you're running residential grading, utility work, or small demo, you've probably started looking at a Link-Belt 135. That was the first machine I bought, back in 2018. It was a solid machine. My mistake was assuming the track gauge was a standard spec. Didn't verify. Turned out the model I ordered was too wide for a standard flatbed permit. That mistake cost me $1,200 in overweight permits and a three-day schedule delay before the machine ever worked (ugh). It wasn't the machine's fault. It was mine for not checking the transport dimensions.
When I see a small contractor dead set on buying a 135, I ask them to count hours. Not the hours they think they'll use it—the hours they actually used any excavator last year. If it's less than 150 hours, rent. At that usage level, the ownership costs rarely make sense. Let's be honest about the math: rental rate x hours + delivery + fuel. Compare that to a machine payment + insurance + storage + regular maintenance + depreciation. The numbers usually tell the story.
If you do buy, budget for more than the machine. Attachments (digging buckets, grading buckets, thumb) add up fast. So does a spare set of service manuals. On our 135, we had a hydraulic pump issue in September 2022 that ran close to $4,500. It happened two years after we bought the machine, so it wasn't under warranty (unfortunately). The pump failure was likely tied to contaminated oil that should have been caught in a routine sample. So glad we started doing monthly oil analysis after that.
The 135 is not a mini excavator—it's a compact 13-ton machine. But if you're coming from mini excavators, the basics still apply. I've trained a few green operators, and here's the short version:
That last point sounds small, but operator awareness is a hidden line item in every TCO calculation. Inattentive operation kills undercarriages.
If you own a rental yard, your priorities are different from a solo contractor's. You need machines that rent out quickly, survive varied (read: sometimes brutal) operators, and retain resale value. The Link-Belt 135, again, is a solid complement to a fleet—especially if you've got smaller minis and a bigger excavator like a 210 to fill the larger jobs. But don't try to make one mid-size machine do everything. I once rented our 135 to a contractor who needed to move 1,500 cubic yards of clay in a week. That was a 20-ton-class job. The machine was perfectly fine—the fit was wrong. He struggled with cycle time, and I had to send a bigger machine after two days. No one was happy.
For rental use, dealer support matters more than the purchase price. Your machine is dead until a part shows up, and when it's on rent, that's lost revenue. I've seen people buy a used Link-Belt through a local equipment outlet like Crewe Tractor—which is fine if they have a solid parts channel, but it's not a substitute for an actual Link-Belt dealer. You need to know where the filter kits, pumps, and undercarriage parts are coming from before you sign.
For heavy civil, quarry, or industrial production, the 135 is probably not your machine. It's a compact 13-ton unit, and it'll do the work, but it'll take longer and burn more operator-hours per yard. On a production site, machine speed is money. Link-Belt's larger excavators, like the 210 and up, are usually a better fit for that world.
I don't have hard data on industry-wide productivity benchmarks, but I can tell you from our own jobs: swapping from a 135 to a 210 cut excavation time on our typical site by around 40%. That's not a claim about the 210 being a magical machine; it's just that the bucket gets bigger and the cycle gets faster. If you're paying a crew to stand around, the bigger machine pays for itself.
The TCO math here is about fuel and service intervals. A larger machine uses more fuel per hour, but it moves more material per gallon. That's the number to measure, not the pump price. I want to say our 210 burns somewhere around 4 to 6 gallons per hour at 90% load, but don't quote me on that—soil conditions, bucket size, and operator all change it.
Also, if you're comparing newer machines to older ones, factor in the emissions rules. Per EPA Tier 4 Final standards, modern diesel engines have cut NOx and particulate emissions substantially. The side effect is that the exhaust aftertreatment system adds complexity and maintenance cost. A pre-Tier 4 machine can look cheap up front, but the TCO might include more downtime and higher repair costs. Either option can work—just don't ignore the difference.
Here's the three-part test I use now:
If you're still stuck, call a Link-Belt dealer and ask for the spec sheet on the 135. Then write down your own hourly costs and do the math yourself. That's how you make a decision you can defend when something goes wrong (and something always goes wrong eventually).
And take the advice from my spreadsheet: verify transport specs, sample your oil, respect trench safety, and leave the Skullcandy Crusher Evo in the truck. The machine you pick matters less than the way you plan for the real cost of running it.
Our engineers provide project-specific recommendations based on your lift plan or excavation scope.
Ask an Engineer